Following an order blocking Attorney General Kathleen Kane from presenting evidence of a selective and vindictive prosecution at trial, criminal defense attorneys said the limitation makes defending Kane much more difficult, and opens up the case to post-trial appeals.

Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy ruled July 28, less than two weeks before Kane’s criminal trial is set to begin, that Kane cannot present evidence to show that former Office of Attorney General prosecutors Frank Fina and E. Marc Costanzo conspired to spark the grand jury investigation that recommended charges against her. Kane had argued that they orchestrated a plot to start the investigation, to keep Kane from exposing their involvement in the exchange of pornographic emails on state email accounts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]