The trial court properly admitted the results of a liquid chromatography test for the presence of controlled substances in appellant's blood, where the law did not statutorily proscribe the types of testing approved for controlled substance testing as the law did for blood alcohol testing. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
July 29, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
DUI • Admissibility of Drug Test Results • Statutorily Approved Chemical Drug Test
Commonwealth v. Stine, PICS Case No. 15-0930 (Pa. Super. July 18, 2016) Platt, J. (9 pages).
The trial court properly admitted the results of a liquid chromatography test for the presence of controlled substances in appellant’s blood, where the law did not statutorily proscribe the types of testing approved for controlled substance testing as the law did for blood alcohol testing. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a corporate associate for its office located in Boston, MA. Candidate must have 2 - 5 years ...
