Public Utility Commission had jurisdiction over intrastate service of pipeline running through state, while the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had jurisdiction over interstate service. PUC could grant utility company eminent domain powers for the pipeline. Order of the trial court affirmed.
July 29, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Condemnation and Taking • Collateral Estoppel • Intrastate Pipeline • Public Need
In Re Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P., PICS Case No. 16-0895 (Pa. Commw. July 14, 2016) Jubelirer, J. (59 pages).
Public Utility Commission had jurisdiction over intrastate service of pipeline running through state, while the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had jurisdiction over interstate service. PUC could grant utility company eminent domain powers for the pipeline. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
