The Pennsylvania Superior Court has denied a Harrisburg attorney’s bid to reopen a case against two of his former associates, who he alleges stole clients from him, in a matter that initiated with two lawsuits filed in 1997 and 2000.
The court on July 26 affirmed a lower court’s order, which denied attorney Ira H. Weinstock’s petition to strike judgment of non pros. In the nonprecedential opinion in Weinstock v. Tomasko, the appellate judges said the lower court did not abuse its discretion, and Weinstock failed to show that the defendants had unclean hands when they requested the non pros judgment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
