A collection agency’s use of a predictive dialer was a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled in a decision granting summary judgment to a man whose cellphone was called by the agency nearly 150 times in two years.

U.S. District Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner of the Middle District of Pennsylvania ruled in Manuel v. NRA Group that the collections agency had violated the ban against using automatic dialing systems to call a cellphone for anything other than emergencies where the party has previously given consent.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]