Bureau properly applied the presumption in §6381(d) in mother's and father's actions challenging their indicated reports as perpetrators of child abuse in case of infant with shaken baby syndrome but bureau erred by not resolving the conflicting rebuttal evidence. Vacated and remanded.
September 02, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Child Abuse • Indicated Report • Expunction • Presumptions • Shaken Baby Syndrome • Rebuttal Evidence
T.H. v Dep’t of Human Serv., PICS Case No. 16-1082 (Pa. Commw. Aug 22, 2016) Cohn Jubelirer, J. (22 pages).
Bureau properly applied the presumption in §6381(d) in mother’s and father’s actions challenging their indicated reports as perpetrators of child abuse in case of infant with shaken baby syndrome but bureau erred by not resolving the conflicting rebuttal evidence. Vacated and remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
