Expert witness in different but related medical specialty from defendant physician was qualified to testify as to the standard of care relating to a portion of a medical procedure on which the expert regularly consulted. Judgment affirmed.
September 09, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Testimony Regarding Standard of Care • Expert Witness in Different Medical Specialty from Defendant • MCARE Act • Cumulative, Substantially Similar Testimony
Frey v. Potorski, PICS Case No. 16-1101 (Pa. Super. Aug. 26, 2016) Fitzgerald, J. (16 pages).
Expert witness in different but related medical specialty from defendant physician was qualified to testify as to the standard of care relating to a portion of a medical procedure on which the expert regularly consulted. Judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...
d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...
Our client, a litigation services boutique, is seeking to add a senior litigation associate to support their rapidly growing practice. A Big...
