Trial court properly found appellant apartment owners liable for electricity delivered to their buildings by PECO because appellants had a contract with PECO by accepting utility services delivered through a master meter to its properties. Affirmed.
September 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Contract • Agency • Unjust Enrichment
Peco Energy Co. v. First Montgomery Props., Ltd. PICS Case No. 16-1132 (Pa. Super. Aug. 30, 2016) (memorandum) Bender, P. J. (12 pages).
Trial court properly found appellant apartment owners liable for electricity delivered to their buildings by PECO because appellants had a contract with PECO by accepting utility services delivered through a master meter to its properties. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
