Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion in limine ordering that appellant's treating physicians could not give their opinions concerning causation of his injuries in case arising from automobile accident. Affirmed.
September 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Automobile Accident • Causation • Reasonable Degree of Medical Certainty • Expert Testimony • Treating Physician
Karkalas v. Martin, PICS Case No. 16-1110 (Pa. Super. Sept. 6, 2016) (memorandum) Platt, J. (25 pages).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion in limine ordering that appellant’s treating physicians could not give their opinions concerning causation of his injuries in case arising from automobile accident. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
