Recorded conversations between an inmate and his visitors on a telephone-like apparatus were properly suppressed pursuant to the Wiretap Act where the act only authorized recordings of inmate telephone calls. Reversed.
October 14, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Inmate Visit Recordings • Motion to Exclude • Wiretap Act • “Telephone Call”
Commonwealth v. Fant, PICS Case No. 16-1249 (Pa. Sept. 28, 2016) Donohue, J.; Baer, J. (dissenting) (32 pages).
Recorded conversations between an inmate and his visitors on a telephone-like apparatus were properly suppressed pursuant to the Wiretap Act where the act only authorized recordings of inmate telephone calls. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
