Just two weeks before the election, the question of whether Pennsylvanians will vote on a constitutional amendment that could raise the state’s mandatory judicial retirement age has finally been settled. Prepare to vote on Nov. 8.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday once again deadlocked on an issue involving the ballot question, this time letting stand a Commonwealth Court ruling that denied a renewed attempt by two former justices and a well-known Philadelphia attorney to have the wording of the question changed. As a result, a complicated piece of litigation that has raced up and down the appellate ladder since early this year has reached a final resolution.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]