A break in contact between appellant and police during a traffic stop following resolution of the purpose of the stop did not serve to nullify facts and circumstances observed by police during the initial valid traffic stop. Adjudication of delinquency affirmed.
November 01, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Adjudication of Delinquency • DUI • Motion to Suppress Evidence • Legality of Detention After “Break in Contact”
In the Interest of A.A., PICS Case No. 16-1305 (Pa. Super. Oct. 18, 2016) Bender, J. (15 pages).
A break in contact between appellant and police during a traffic stop following resolution of the purpose of the stop did not serve to nullify facts and circumstances observed by police during the initial valid traffic stop. Adjudication of delinquency affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
