The trial court acted arbitrarily in denying a guardian ad litem 79 percent of her requested legal fees based on the trial court's determination that the GAL spent too much time representing the interests of the child. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
November 04, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Child Custody • Guardian Ad Litem • Request for Compensation for GAL Services • Rejection of Fees
L.M.P. v. E.C., PICS Case No. 16-1326 (Pa. Super. Oct. 26, 2016) Dubow, J. (8 pages).
The trial court acted arbitrarily in denying a guardian ad litem 79 percent of her requested legal fees based on the trial court’s determination that the GAL spent too much time representing the interests of the child. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
