The trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant in a slip-and-fall case where there was sufficient record evidence for the jury to reasonably infer that the dilapidated condition of concrete steps where plaintiff fell caused plaintiff's slip-and-fall. Summary judgment vacated, case remanded.
November 11, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Slip-and-Fall • Dangerous Condition • Causation • Open and Notorious Condition
Hitchner v. Bartell, PICS Case No. 16-1356 (Pa. Super. Oct. 24, 2016) (memorandum) Lazarus, J. (9 pages).
The trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant in a slip-and-fall case where there was sufficient record evidence for the jury to reasonably infer that the dilapidated condition of concrete steps where plaintiff fell caused plaintiff’s slip-and-fall. Summary judgment vacated, case remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Rogers Law Offices is seeking highly motivated and experienced attorneys to join our dynamic team. The ideal candidate will possess a stron...
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
