Harrisburg lawyer Richard C. Angino and his wife initially lost their lawsuit against an insurance company, in which he claimed he was permanently injured in a car crash. However, after a federal jury sided with the insurance company, the lawyer’s request for a new trial was granted on a single issue.
The Cincinnati Insurance Co. argued in Angino’s underinsured motorist case that his neck and back pain were due to age, not the result of a car crash that rattled the 75-year-old and his wife, Alice Angino. U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson of the Middle District of Pennsylvania said in his opinion that the jury’s verdict finding that the insurance company was not the cause of Richard Angino’s injuries, which included lost wages, was a “repudiation” of Angino’s claims of permanent disability.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
