Ironically, as of Nov. 9, I had never fielded more phone calls, emails and Facebook messages than since the passage of marriage equality. That’s because everyone in the LGBTQ community is concerned about the state of their rights. For those who are wondering how actively President-elect Donald J. Trump wants to pursue the rolling back of LGBTQ rights and equality—this is a first in a series of columns outlining the possible ramifications of his administration on the progress we’ve made.

The first disturbing signal came early on Nov. 9 when The New York Times reported that Trump’s first priority for America was to select a conservative nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court ­vacancy. Whether his intention in doing so is directly to ­reverse marriage equality, it will be on the ­chopping block ­regardless. Not to ­mention, with a vacancy on the Supreme Court and three judges who voted to legalize same-sex marriage—Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer—at the ages of 83, 80 and 78, ­respectively, tipping the scale toward an anti-LGBTQ Supreme Court is scarily 
within reach.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]