Judgment was affirmed after appellant's counsel's failure to appear for trial, where the failure to appear supported the presumption that counsel was not ready for trial without satisfactory cause. Order of the trial court affirmed.
November 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Car Sale • Failure to Deliver Title • Judgment in Absence of Adverse Party • Notice of Trial
Kilson v. Top Class Auto, Inc., PICS Case No. 16-1378 (Pa. Super. Nov. 2, 2016) (memorandum) Ford Elliott, J. (13 pages).
Judgment was affirmed after appellant’s counsel’s failure to appear for trial, where the failure to appear supported the presumption that counsel was not ready for trial without satisfactory cause. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
