The trial court improperly permitted rebuttal expert testimony to offer opinion on causation of the victim's death, even though such testimony could have been given in the commonwealth's case-in-chief. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
November 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Rebuttal Witness • Jury Instructions • Scope of Cross-Examination of Defense Witness • Qualification of Expert Witness
Commonwealth v. Yale, PICS Case No. 16-1386 (Pa. Super. Nov. 10, 2016) Ott, J. (16 pages).
The trial court improperly permitted rebuttal expert testimony to offer opinion on causation of the victim’s death, even though such testimony could have been given in the commonwealth’s case-in-chief. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a junior level commercial litigation associate admitted to practice in Connecticut, with a d...
