While somewhat on the order of “Aside from that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?” two Pennsylvania Superior Court decisions, both handed down on Nov. 8, at least provided the basis for this article on appellate practice. These are: Farrell v. Regola, ___ A.3d ___, No. 566 WDA 2015, (Pa. Super. Nov. 8), and Nobles v. Staples, ___ A.3d ___, 2016 (Pa. Super. Nov. 8). Both discuss recurrent points that should be of interest to appellate practitioners in Pennsylvania, particularly on the civil side.
Collateral Order Appeals
Farrell involved an attempt to take discovery of privileged information, and thus the application of the collateral order doctrine. The plaintiff in a wrongful death/suicide action sought discovery of: the defendant’s psychotherapy records concerning the incident, and certain notes the defendant had made at his counsel’s direction. After considerable procedural skirmishing, the trial judge ordered that the disputed documents be produced for in camera judicial review. The defendant appealed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
