The trial court correctly precluded evidence and testimony of repairs to a floor where a slip-and-fall accident occurred because they were inadmissible evidence of subsequent remedial measures.
December 02, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Slip-and-Fall • Limiting of Testimony • Preclusion of Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measure
Milano v. Commerce Square Partners-Philadelphia Plaza, L.P., PICS Case No. 16-1403 (C.P. Philadelphia Aug. 16, 2016) Shreeves-Johns, J. (15 pages).
The trial court correctly precluded evidence and testimony of repairs to a floor where a slip-and-fall accident occurred because they were inadmissible evidence of subsequent remedial measures.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
