Counsel was properly disqualified for attempting to interfere with opposing party's expert witness testimony, which actions would have deprived opposing party of its due process right to a fair trial. Judgment affirmed.
December 02, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Failure to Diagnose Cancer • Sufficiency and Weight of Evidence • Preclusion of Testimony • Disqualification of Counsel
Sutch v. Roxborough Mem’l Hosp., PICS Case No. 16-1443 (Pa. Super. Nov. 15, 2016) Jenkins, J. (37 pages).
Counsel was properly disqualified for attempting to interfere with opposing party’s expert witness testimony, which actions would have deprived opposing party of its due process right to a fair trial. Judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
