Trial court properly applied the deadly weapon enhancement in sentencing appellant who pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, attempting to elude, reckless endangerment, driving without a license and driving at an unsafe speed because the sentencing court had no discretion to refuse to apply the enhancement where it was appropriate. Affirmed.
December 02, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Sentencing • Deadly Weapon Enhancement • Motor Vehicle
Commonwealth v. Solomon, PICS Case No. 16-1451 (Pa. Super. Nov. 22, 2016) Ransom, J. (9 pages).
Trial court properly applied the deadly weapon enhancement in sentencing appellant who pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, attempting to elude, reckless endangerment, driving without a license and driving at an unsafe speed because the sentencing court had no discretion to refuse to apply the enhancement where it was appropriate. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
