The court affirmed judgment of sentence and appellant challenged the trial court's refusal to impose the deadly weapons enhancement in hit and run accident arguing appellant had no intention to use the automobile as a deadly weapon.
December 09, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Sentencing Enhancement • Use of a Deadly Weapon • Evidence
Commonwealth v. Jonathan Nelson Smith, PICS Case No. 16-1476 (Pa. Super. Nov. 29, 2016) Bowes, J. (14 pages)
The court affirmed judgment of sentence and appellant challenged the trial court’s refusal to impose the deadly weapons enhancement in hit and run accident arguing appellant had no intention to use the automobile as a deadly weapon.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
