In this patent infringement action, the court noted that there may be more than one reliable method for estimating a reasonably royalty and motions to exclude expert testimony were denied.
December 09, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Royalties • Evidence • Expert Testimony
Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC v. Sprint Commc’ns Co., LP, PICS Case No. 16-1474 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2016) DuBois, J. (21 pages).
In this patent infringement action, the court noted that there may be more than one reliable method for estimating a reasonably royalty and motions to exclude expert testimony were denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong TEAM that operates with the highest standards of independ...
When you come to work for New Jersey Judiciary you will join an 8500-member strong team that operates with the highest standards of independ...
CAREER OPPORTUNITYUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT - USDC-CT 24-14 POSITION: Pro Se Law Clerk OPENI...
