Civil penalties arising from the refusal of a blood test following an arrest for DUI, in violation of the Implied Consent Law, was constitutional, where there was no criminal consequence for refusing a blood test.
December 09, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Suspension of Driving Privileges • DUI • Refusal of Consent to Blood Test • Constitutionality of Implied Consent Law
Marchese v. PennDOT, PICS Case No. 16-1496 (C.P. Lycoming Nov. 10, 2016) McCoy, J. (7 pages).
Civil penalties arising from the refusal of a blood test following an arrest for DUI, in violation of the Implied Consent Law, was constitutional, where there was no criminal consequence for refusing a blood test.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
