In a strongly worded opinion, a federal judge in Pennsylvania has denied Jill Stein’s motion for a recount of the presidential election ballots cast in the state, saying the unsuccessful Green Party candidate’s suspicion that voting machines may have been hacked “borders on the irrational.”
About three weeks after the Nov. 8 election, Stein brought suits demanding recounts in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin—the three states where Republican President-elect Donald Trump defeated Democratic challenger Hillary Clinton by the narrowest margins.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
