A state employee and his agency were entitled to sovereign immunity under the Sovereign Immunity Act to bar claims of defamation per se or intentional torts committed in the employee's scope of work. Judgment affirmed.
December 16, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Defamation Per Se • Sovereign Immunity • Actual Malice or Willful Misconduct
Ioven v. Nestel, PICS Case No. 16-1515 (Pa. Commw. Nov. 30, 2016) Friedman, J. (7 pages).
A state employee and his agency were entitled to sovereign immunity under the Sovereign Immunity Act to bar claims of defamation per se or intentional torts committed in the employee’s scope of work. Judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
