Probably the biggest hurdle to ­bringing lawsuits to protect animals is the fact that animals are considered property under the law. The ramifications of that legal status cannot be overstated. It means, among other things, that the law does not recognize their suffering as a compensable harm in a tort case, that they cannot enforce the protections afforded them by statutes such as the Endangered Species Act or the Animal Welfare Act and that, as far as the law is concerned, their value is limited to their replacement cost. For decades, animal lawyers and ethicists have tried to chip away at this property status as a means of attaining some kind of rights for animals. Most recently, Steven Wise and the Nonhuman Rights Project have received a fair amount of press attention for their battle in the courts of New York to establish rights for captive chimpanzees. The chimps, as named petitioners, are using the common law of habeus corpus to challenge the ­legality of their detention just as other “unjustly ­incarcerated beings” have done throughout history. While years of research have gone into arriving at such creative legal theories and determining the best forum to raise those kinds of novel arguments, having a court grant the habeas corpus petition of a captive chimpanzee is still asking for quite a large leap.

Less well known are more modest ­efforts that have been successful in state ­legislatures, moving the needle slowly but deliberately in the direction of legal recognition of the interests of animals. Recognizing interests may be the first step to recognizing that animals may actually be entitled to some legal rights, for instance, the right to bodily integrity. The Alaska and Connecticut legislatures have taken steps to acknowledge what is obvious to anyone who has ever cared for an animal—they are not mere things. They have interests, preferences and they experience pain, physical and emotional, much the way that humans do and the law should recognize and address that in some way.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]