Trial court properly held that class action claims administrator's determination of appellant's losses had to be considered as representing appellant's whole loss. Affirmed.
December 22, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Subrogation • Class Action • “Made Whole” Doctrine • Costs and Fees
Prof’l Flooring Co. Inc. v. Bushar Corp., PICS Case No. 16-1560 (Pa. Super. Dec. 6, 2016) Olson, J. (32 pages).
Trial court properly held that class action claims administrator’s determination of appellant’s losses had to be considered as representing appellant’s whole loss. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...
