Where the sentencing court sentenced a DUI offender to county intermediate punishment, the court was not required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence because CIP constituted an alternative sentencing scheme to which the mandatory maximum sentence statute did not apply. Judgment affirmed.
December 30, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
DUI • County Intermediate Punishment • Requirement to Impose Mandatory Maximum Sentence
Commonwealth v. Popielarcheck, PICS Case No. 16-1553 (Pa. Super. Dec. 6, 2016) Dubow, J. (11 pages).
Where the sentencing court sentenced a DUI offender to county intermediate punishment, the court was not required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence because CIP constituted an alternative sentencing scheme to which the mandatory maximum sentence statute did not apply. Judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
General Counsel Posting Number: 1925 Closing Date: Location: Oakland, CA (Hybrid) The Public Health Institute (PHI) is an in...
We are seeking an associate to join our Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights practice in either Hartford or Stamford. Candidates should have a...
We are an established and highly regarded White Plains law firm seeking a dedicated and skilled mid-to-senior level associate attorney with ...
