While the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a number of significant rulings and agreed to take up a wide range of important issues throughout the year, the justices also helped to shape state law in 2016 by either rejecting appeals or failing to reach a consensus in several closely watched cases.
Nowhere did the lack of a Supreme Court decision have more of an impact than in the protracted battle over the judicial retirement age ballot question, which worked its way up to the justices not once, but twice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
