Trial court properly convicted inmate of spitting saliva on corrections officer where inmate filed his mouth with water and spat on officer because the testimonial and video evidence supplied sufficient circumstantial evidence to infer that a mixture of water and saliva landed on the officer. Affirmed.
January 13, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Aggravated Harassment by Prisoner • Saliva Testing • Circumstantial Evidence
Commonwealth v. Hecker, PICS Case No. 17-0027 (Pa. Super. Dec. 28, 2016) Stevens, P. J. (10 pages).
Trial court properly convicted inmate of spitting saliva on corrections officer where inmate filed his mouth with water and spat on officer because the testimonial and video evidence supplied sufficient circumstantial evidence to infer that a mixture of water and saliva landed on the officer. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
