Rule 11 sanctions were properly denied where the trial court found that plaintiffs' pleadings had a factual basis and were not "patently unmeritorious or frivolous." Order of the district court affirmed.
January 20, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Assault by Faculty Member • Gender Discrimination • Rule 11 Sanctions • Denial of Unopposed Motion
Moeck v. Pleasant Valley Sch. Dist., PICS Case No. 17-0071 (3d Cir. Dec. 23, 2016) Shwartz, C.J. (11 pages).
Rule 11 sanctions were properly denied where the trial court found that plaintiffs’ pleadings had a factual basis and were not “patently unmeritorious or frivolous.” Order of the district court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a junior level commercial litigation associate admitted to practice in Connecticut, with a d...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
