Personal Injury • Preclusion of Expert Testimony • Failure of Motion in Limine to State Reasons for Preclusion of Testimony • Sufficiency of Expertise to Render
Lingham v. Faison, PICS Case No. 17-0069 (Pa. Super. Jan. 11, 2017) (memorandum) Shogan, J. (9 pages).
The trial court properly precluded an expert medical witness’ opinion testimony regarding the reasonableness and necessity of a procedure where the expert lacked any particularized knowledge of the procedure and could not identify the standard of care. Judgment affirmed.
