Piercing of the corporate veil in a breach of sales contract was necessary to prohibit a parent company from being unjustly enriched by its manipulation of the corporate form where it retained funds paid to the corporate subsidiary. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.
January 27, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Breach • Piercing of the Corporate Veil • Imposition of Liability on Parent Company • Unjust Enrichment
QVC, Inc. v. OurHouseWorks, LLC, PICS Case No. 17-0100 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2016) DuBois, J. (12 pages).
Piercing of the corporate veil in a breach of sales contract was necessary to prohibit a parent company from being unjustly enriched by its manipulation of the corporate form where it retained funds paid to the corporate subsidiary. Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
