The court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant under the "effects" test for an intentional tort action where plaintiff failed to allege that defendant directed any tortious conduct at the forum state. Motion to dismiss granted.
January 27, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Defamation • Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations • Personal Jurisdiction
Aardvark Event Logistics, Inc. v. Bobcar Media LLC, PICS Case No. 17-0089 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 5, 2017) O’Neill, J. (16 pages).
The court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant under the “effects” test for an intentional tort action where plaintiff failed to allege that defendant directed any tortious conduct at the forum state. Motion to dismiss granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a corporate associate for its office located in Boston, MA. Candidate must have 2 - 5 years ...
