For the last nine years, the bankruptcy of media conglomerate Tribune Co. has produced a long diary of court opinions interpreting a variety of Bankruptcy Code provisions. It is time for a new entry. Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed with prejudice a fraudulent conveyance claim brought by a litigation trustee seeking recovery on behalf of the company’s unsecured creditors in In re Tribune Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation, No. 11-md-2296, 2017 BL 5202 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6). This was no garden-variety fraudulent conveyance claim: the trustee sought to recover $8 billion that certain Tribune public shareholders received as part of the ill-fated leveraged buyout that took place prior to the company’s December 2008 bankruptcy. The Tribune court dismissed the trustee’s claim for several reasons, but most significantly for failure to sufficiently allege that the actions of the company’s officers should have be imputed to the company for purposes of determining whether Tribune entered in the LBO with the requisite intent to defraud creditors. Judge Richard Sullivan’s decision on this issue is important not only because of its applicability to fraudulent conveyance actions involving corporations, but also because he applied a different legal standard and reached a different conclusion than his colleague, Judge Denise Cote, in In re Lyondell Chemical, 554 B.R. 635, 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
The events precipitating the Tribune bankruptcy are familiar by now but will be summarized briefly below. In June 2006, in the midst the company’s deteriorating financial condition, Tribune’s board of directors formed a special committee of independent directors to pursue a sale of the company, including through an LBO, in which a target company is acquired for a purchase price that is funded largely by a loan secured on the target company’s assets. Notably excluded from the special committee were board members who owned significant amounts of company stock, CEO Dennis FitzSimons (13 percent owner) and three members who represented various trusts (collective 20 percent owners). In early 2007, an investment group led by Sam Zell reached an agreement in principle to acquire a controlling interest in Tribune through a two-step LBO. The board and special committee each engaged investment banks and other advisers to vet the transaction. After the banks and advisers issued initial fairness and “solvency opinions”—i.e., statements opining that post-transaction, the company would be able to pay its debts as they came due—the special committee unanimously recommended that the full board approve the transaction. The full board did so.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]