Plaintiff failed to establish that the actions of the defendant driver more likely than not were the cause of the injuries plaintiff sustained. The court found sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury's verdict that plaintiff was 60 percent causally liable for his injures. Motion for new trial denied.
February 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Motion for New Trial • Comparative Negligence
Kochmer v. Hopfner, PICS Case No. 17-0168 (C.P. Philadelphia Jan. 12, 2017) Massiah-Jackson, J. (14 pages).
Plaintiff failed to establish that the actions of the defendant driver more likely than not were the cause of the injuries plaintiff sustained. The court found sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdict that plaintiff was 60 percent causally liable for his injures. Motion for new trial denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...
d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...
Our client, a litigation services boutique, is seeking to add a senior litigation associate to support their rapidly growing practice. A Big...
