Court properly granted an implied easement and permanently enjoined appellants from interfering with the repair and use of a sewer line that ran under their property and serviced appellee's property because the sewer was in existence before their predecessors-in-title bought the property. Affirmed.
February 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Implied Easement • Sewer Line • Notice
Gurecka v. Carroll, PICS Case No. 17-0209 (Pa. Super. Feb. 3, 2017) Bender, P.J. (16 pages).
Court properly granted an implied easement and permanently enjoined appellants from interfering with the repair and use of a sewer line that ran under their property and serviced appellee’s property because the sewer was in existence before their predecessors-in-title bought the property. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
