Communications between attorneys and a public relations firm working with a hospital in connection with an internal investigation are not barred from discovery in a subsequent lawsuit under either the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.
A three-judge panel of the court ruled March 13 in BouSamra v. Excela Health to deny efforts by Excela Health, which runs Westmoreland Regional Hospital, to bar discovery of the documents. The decision upheld a ruling from the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas and relied heavily on a 2014 Commonwealth Court decision involving whether documents related to Penn State’s internal investigation of convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky’s conduct, commonly referred to as the Freeh report, were discoverable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
