Zoning board erred in granting a variance to construct a front yard open-air parking space where property owners' inability to reach a rear parking space did not represent a physical circumstance unique to the property constituting an unnecessary hardship. Order of the trial court reversed.
March 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Variance • Open-Air Parking • Unnecessary Hardship
In re Appeal of Chestnut Hill Cmty. Ass’n, PICS Case No. 17-0372 (Pa. Commw. March 3, 2017) Covey, J. (17 pages).
Zoning board erred in granting a variance to construct a front yard open-air parking space where property owners’ inability to reach a rear parking space did not represent a physical circumstance unique to the property constituting an unnecessary hardship. Order of the trial court reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
