Child Pornography • Sexual Abuse of Children • Discovery • After Discovered Evidence

Commonwealth v. Rudinski, PICS Case No. 17-0256 (C.P. Lycoming Feb. 9, 2017) Butts, P. J. (10 pages).

Defendant filed a post-sentence motion arguing discovery violations and seeking a new trial based on after discovered evidence in his trial for having child pornography on his computer but the court found no discovery violation because it was incumbent on defense counsel to seek the expert’s full report prior to trial and defendant offered no evidence to support the allegations of wrongdoing by the commonwealth’s expert witness. Motion denied.