Trial court erred in holding that the Rule 600 time limits had expired and dismissing the charges against appellee because the commonwealth used due diligence in its IAD transfer request. Reversed.
March 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Rule 600 Petition • Extradition • Due Diligence • Excludable Time
Commonwealth v. Plowden, PICS Case No. 17-0363 (Pa. Super. March 8, 2017) Ott, J. (18 pages).
Trial court erred in holding that the Rule 600 time limits had expired and dismissing the charges against appellee because the commonwealth used due diligence in its IAD transfer request. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
