OOR erred in ordering disclosure of retired state employees' home addresses without first performing a balancing test between the public interest in disclosure and the employees' privacy interest. Final determination of the OOR vacated, case remanded.
March 17, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Right-to-Know Law • Request for SERS Member Home Addresses • Public Interest vs. Privacy Interest Balancing Test
State Emp. Ret. Sys. v. Campbell, PICS Case No. 17-0378 (Pa. Commw. March 3, 2017) Cosgrove, J. (6 pages).
OOR erred in ordering disclosure of retired state employees’ home addresses without first performing a balancing test between the public interest in disclosure and the employees’ privacy interest. Final determination of the OOR vacated, case remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
