Trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit defendant's proffered expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identification. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
April 04, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Expert Testimony Regarding Eyewitness Identification • Preclusion of Testimony • Eyewitness Identification Not Sole or Primary Evidence of Guilt
Commonwealth v. Selenski, PICS Case No. 17-0456 (Pa. Super. March 16, 2017) Solano, J. (31 pages).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit defendant’s proffered expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identification. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
