Trial court erred in ordering restitution that was beyond the jury's verdict in a home improvement fraud case because the jury had all the necessary evidence as to damages before it at the time of trial. Sentence vacated and remanded.
April 07, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Home Improvement Fraud • Restitution
Commonwealth v. Poplawski, PICS Case No. 17-0505 (Pa. Super. March 24, 2017) Ransom, J. (7 pages).
Trial court erred in ordering restitution that was beyond the jury’s verdict in a home improvement fraud case because the jury had all the necessary evidence as to damages before it at the time of trial. Sentence vacated and remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
