ATM company was only entitled to lost profits for defendant's repudiation of the parties' agreement to place an ATM in defendant's store for the period between defendant's disconnection of the machine and his request to have plaintiff remove the ATM.
April 07, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Breach • Mitigation of Damages • Reasonable Efforts • Proof of Lost Profits
Rezro Inc. v. Lanfranco, PICS Case No. 17-0353 (C.P. Philadelphia Feb. 28, 2017) Fox, J. (30 pages).
ATM company was only entitled to lost profits for defendant’s repudiation of the parties’ agreement to place an ATM in defendant’s store for the period between defendant’s disconnection of the machine and his request to have plaintiff remove the ATM.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
