Trial court abused its discretion in holding an adjudicatory hearing and entering a dependency order despite agency's failure to adhere to the notice and service provisions of the rules of juvenile procedure and the juvenile act. Order vacated.
April 14, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Rules of Juvenile Procedure • Notice • Dependency Proceeding
In the Interest of K.S., PICS Case No. 17-0514 (Pa. Super. March 29, 2017) Musmanno, J. (10 pages).
Trial court abused its discretion in holding an adjudicatory hearing and entering a dependency order despite agency’s failure to adhere to the notice and service provisions of the rules of juvenile procedure and the juvenile act. Order vacated.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Stern, Lavinthal & Frankenberg, LLC, is seeking a foreclosure attorney experienced in the NJ and/or NY foreclosure process and default l...
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...
