The court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings, because the statute of limitations barred plaintiff's negligence action due to lack of timely service. The failure to adhere to local policy regarding service of process and delaying for at least eight months to effectuate service did not demonstrate good faith.
April 28, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Statute of Limitations • Service of Process • Good Faith
Luisi v. Siletti, PICS Case No. 17-0567 (C.P. Monroe Mar. 10, 2017) Sibum, J. (19 pages).
The court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings, because the statute of limitations barred plaintiff’s negligence action due to lack of timely service. The failure to adhere to local policy regarding service of process and delaying for at least eight months to effectuate service did not demonstrate good faith.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
