A pro se litigant's complaint regarding allegedly deceptive conduct by a car dealership was legally insufficient where plaintiff failed to cite any statute or other legal authority, and the nature of his claim was not obvious from the face of the complaint.
May 05, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Deceptive Practices • Pro Se Litigants • Sufficiency of Pleadings
Campbell v. Chevy 21, PICS Case No. 17-0382 (C.P. Northampton Feb. 14, 2017) Murray, J. (6 pages).
A pro se litigant’s complaint regarding allegedly deceptive conduct by a car dealership was legally insufficient where plaintiff failed to cite any statute or other legal authority, and the nature of his claim was not obvious from the face of the complaint.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is looking for a passionate and dedicated individual with extensive enforcement experience as well as ...
Public Finance Attorney wanted for established New Jersey bond counsel firm located in Cranford, New Jersey. New Jersey municipal and schoo...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C.Prominent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks an Application Engineer. This person will work...
